The Development of the Comfort Zone and Development Phase Theories Essay

The Development of the Comfort Zone and Development Phase Theories - Essay Example This research will begin with the statement that the comfort zone theory focuses on the situations in which people experience the greatest comfort either mentally or physically. It is usually the brain that interprets the objects or situations that make a person comfortable. This paper illustrates that comfort zones are different for different people and they influence the behavior of individuals. A person’s comfort zone could be engaging in group work while another may be comfortable working alone to accomplish personal goals. The nature of a comfort zone determines the manner in which people react to various issues. The comfort zone maintains the character of a person and may become a hindrance to personal development if there are no opportunities for inventiveness. In other words, the comfort zone might be a barrier to thinking outside of what is already known by an individual. The present research has identified that mental expansion may not be accomplished in such a comfo rt zone. Substantial changes might result from tragedies forcing a person outside the comfort zone. Development phase theory, on the other hand, is based on the hypotheses that development is an irregular process that occurs through a series of phases in which individuals have distinct behaviors. In group development, Tuckman in Wheelan & Conway identifies four phases of development, which include; â€Å"forming, storming, norming and performing†.

Lesson V Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Lesson V - Research Paper Example Further, Siva did not act ethically by suing Hess as he had not entered into a personal agreement with Hess but with 1138 LLC. If Siva wanted Hess to be personally liable for the debt, he would have asked Hess to sign the lease agreement in an individual capacity and hence Hess would have been personally liable (Cooper & Lyman, 1998) The appending of Mr. Soskin’s signature on the contract document indicating that he would personally guarantee any defaulted payments by Nashville holds him personally liable to pay the debt (Cheeseman, 2013). He therefore acted as a personal guarantor to Nashville LLC and any failed payments by the company would be recovered from Soskin’s personal assets as he became personally liable by signing a document with a paragraph saying â€Å"I personally guarantee...† If Soskin intended to act as just a representative as he stipulate in his defense, he would have therefore asked for an amendment of the clause which made him personally liable (Cheeseman, 2013) Under the subject of Liability of the franchisor, he case quoted is Martin v. McDonalds Corp. where McDonald’s was sued for negligence. The court’s decision held that McDonald’s was negligent for failure of following up and making sure that deficiencies in security at the Oak Forest Franchise were corrected. The liability of a franchisor therefore affects businesses in the United States as the franchisors are tasked to ensure that security procedures are adhered to and thus manuals should be circulated in all franchised business for conformance (Cheeseman, 2013). In the subject of right to accounting, Steeby v, Fial case is applied where Steeby sued Fial for breach of fiduciary duty while seeking for final accounting. The trial court found that Fial had in his actions violated the partnership agreement and hence breached the fiduciary duty by terminating the auditors and dissipating partnership assets. Also, he had terminated contracts for the clients